Fae,

If I were you I would complain to the Telegraph about the words "and posted “highly inappropriate” links in relation to explicit material on Wikipedia." especially as they didn't even weasel that with an allegedly.

I may be missing something, but as far as I'm aware that is purely a smear. The full quote is,

"The controversy is the second to rock Wikimedia UK in recent months. In August the chair of the charity’s board of trustees, Ashley van Haeften, was forced to resign after The Telegraph reported he had been banned from editing Wikipedia for “numerous violations of Wikipedia's norms and policies”.

He allegedly mounted personal attacks and posted “highly inappropriate” links in relation to explicit material on Wikipedia.  Although he resigned as chair, Mr van Haeften remains on Wikimedia UK’s board of trustees"

Surely this gives you something you could take to the press complaints commission or even further. In your shoes I'd be asking for damages.


Jonathan




On 3 October 2012 10:29, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
The DT are reporting that Wikimedia UK has been "barred from
processing donations":

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/9581813/Wikipedia-charity-faces-investigation-over-trustee-conflict-of-interest.html

 Can we get this error corrected ASAP? It's also in the Wikipedia
article on Gibraltarpedia.

(I haven't yet read all of the article)

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org