Martin makes a good point and now that I'm off work for a few days ill reply as a volunteer: I would be in favour of signing this. is something I believe most members would agree with signing too.
Thanks for the replies. As Martin notes, I haven't said it is out of scope, but that *some may* feel that way.It is a tricky question, actually. If I had to call it on my own view, I'd say sign it as it is worthwhile. "Free and open" being the key words here - if there is widespread and secretive surveillance, then the web, and the knowledge contained therein, becomes neither free nor open. But I can see that it isn't necessarily clear-cut, hence asking the question.On 28 November 2013 15:23, Richard Symonds <richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Well, it's not really directly linked to our objects ("for the benefit of the public, to promote and support the widest possible public access to, use of and contribution to Open Content of an encyclopaedic or educational nature or of similar utility to the general public"). That said, ensuring that data safeguards are in place (in part by signing things like this) would help encourage people to use the internet and be more open with their knowledge (as they can trust it more if it's properly regulated and data isn't being surreptitiously obtained by all and sundry).A complex question.Richard SymondsWikimedia UK0207 065 0992Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
On 28 November 2013 15:18, Fæ <faewik@gmail.com> wrote:On 28 November 2013 13:24, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:What were the "out of our scope" objections?
> Hello everyone,
>
> Wikimedia UK has been asked to consider signing a document supporting these
> International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to
> Communications Surveillance In principle I think this is worthwhile and
> shows that we are on the side of the every day internet user. But some may
> say it is out of our scope. What do people think? If there's a consensus
> I'll add Wikimedia UK to the list.
>
> This can be discussed on this list or on the Water Cooler of the WMUK wiki
> if you prefer.
Thanks,
Fae
--
faewik@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
--Stevie Benton Communications Organiser Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBentonWikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org