The problem probably lies with the volume of business on each board meeting agenda. We're only just keeping up with the business, and as much as I'd like to see a constructive discussion and a positive decision made on the future election process, I personally won't find the time in the near future to organise an EGM.
I'm encouraged by James' offer, and the more volunteers we have who would be willing to devote some time into defining the parameters for discussion (maybe a proposer and seconder for a resolution?), or suggesting possible timescales and venues for an EGM, the easier it gets to fulfil our commitment to having a new process in place by the next AGM.
All contributions are welcome.
--
DougOn 17 September 2012 22:24, James Farrar <james.farrar@gmail.com> wrote:
Now that I am no longer in the process of getting married, I can start making some progress on this.
On Sep 17, 2012 9:48 PM, "Chris Keating" <chriskeatingwiki@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk@effeietsanders.org> wrote:Chris, if I may at least ask for a very short clarification of the no: are you confirming there has been no communication/decision on the issue on board level, or do you confirm there will be no such EGM (as far as the board is concerned)?There has been no progress. :-)Personally I would quite like some progress, and think we ought to use STV - it would be great if people could get drafting resolutions.Thanks,Chris_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org