On Mar 9, 2012 2:35 PM, "Michael Peel" <michael.peel@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:32, Tom Morris wrote:
>
> > On 9 March 2012 13:48, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/who-are-the-commons-moles-changing-wikipedia-entries-7545991.html
> >>
> >
> > Headline: "Who are the Commons moles changing Wikipedia entries?"
> >
> > My initial thought was "Commons people aren't allowed to edit
> > Wikipedia?" (and also something along the lines of "well, we know
> > Commons people like their 'nude or semi-nude women with Muppets', but
> > even so, calling them 'moles' seems a bit harsh!").
> >
> > Then I grokked that it was the House of Commons, not Wikimedia Commons.
> >
> > Too much time at the coal face, methinks.
>
> I thought exactly the same thing, followed by "ooh, there's a Wikimedia Commons article on page 3 of the Independent! Fantastic!". Should have known better. ;-)
>
> Mike
>

What I read: "There's a Wikimedia Commons picture on page 3!" Anyone takers on Commons for the challenge? ;)

> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org