Longer shot than that - it&#39;s more like getting Counter-Strike onto Olympics. All current heritage site listings are currently tied to a geographical location; trying to get Wikipedia on will mean creating an entirely new category listing. Add to that Wikipedia&#39;s orders of magnitude younger than the heritage sites currently on the list.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 24 May 2011 11:01, Charles Matthews <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com">charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 24/05/2011 09:19, Chris Keating wrote:<br>
&gt; Wikimedia DE is running a campaign to have Wikipedia recognised as a<br>
&gt; UNESCO world heritage site.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I just wondered what peoples&#39; views here on this were?<br>
<br>
</div>Long shot, like trying to get paintball included in the Olympics. Not a<br>
bad idea to be talking to UNESCO, but who should be talking to whom<br>
about what? Some of the sister projects are more about &quot;heritage&quot;, in fact.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Charles<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikimedia UK mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org">wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l" target="_blank">http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l</a><br>
WMUK: <a href="http://uk.wikimedia.org" target="_blank">http://uk.wikimedia.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>