If this diff was the change:
Fair point. The reason I wrote it that way is because they basically took The Times story and repackaged it. But yes, a distinction worth making.Thanks,
StevieOn 12 November 2012 17:25, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:On 12 November 2012 16:59, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:I wouldn't say the Telegraph "republished" the Times story - that
> Wikimedia UK has just published a blog post giving its response to today's news stories in The Times and The Daily Telegraph about paid editing of Wikipedia.
> You can see the blog post at http://bit.ly/ZfSaln but the full content is below.
implies a reprint or licensed copy - though it's clear they just
worked straight from it. Possibly "also ran the story".
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
--Stevie Benton Communications Organiser Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173 @StevieBentonWikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org