On 24 March 2015 at 14:06, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas@googlemail.com> wrote:

It strikes me that the only non programme overspend is related to Jon leaving. Given the troublesome financial state, and the boards fiduciary duty, perhaps they need to explain in detail why this happened and why no effort was made to defer it to the next financial year when it could have been accounted for?

Proverbially one grasps the nettle when the chickens come home to roost, hoping to stitch up the spilt milk in a timely fashion? Something along those lines.