On 24 March 2015 at 14:06, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
It strikes me that the only non programme overspend is
related to Jon
leaving. Given the troublesome financial state, and the boards fiduciary
duty, perhaps they need to explain in detail why this happened and why no
effort was made to defer it to the next financial year when it could have
been accounted for?
Proverbially one grasps the nettle when the chickens come home to roost,
hoping to
stitch up the spilt milk in a timely fashion? Something along
those lines.
Charles