(re-sending in case I'm still having problems with my mikepeel.net address - apologies if this comes through twice!)

On 28 Aug 2013, at 21:31, Michael Peel <email@mikepeel.net> wrote:

> Hi Stevie,
>
> Thanks for sharing the draft. It's better to upload large files like this to the wiki and then link to them, rather than sending around large files by email, though. Here's some suggestions for improvement/corrections:
>
> I think there's a font issue either with the PDF or your computer - some of the t's are appearing very oddly, with a little loop going from the top of the t back over the previous letter. E.g. see the text on page 8 where the issue is particularly clear. Let me know if you can't reproduce this, and I'll send you a screenshot.
>
> Page 2 - "media from Commons is used by", that should be "media from Commons are used by" as 'media' is plural in this situation. (I've pointed this out on the file talk page for the original as it's a mistake in that version.)
>
> Page 3 - you might want to tidy the indentation on the text there. E.g. under 'What is allowed', the first bullet point should be at the same level as the next two, and under 'What is not allowed' the last line of the intro paragraph should be indented at the same level as the rest of the paragraph. Similarly, in the sidebar on page 10 could do with some tidying as the x's appear on the second line in some cases. These are probably due to differences in software versions or settings as they look OK in the original version.
>
> Page 6 - there seems to be a closing bracket missing after the media symbol in point (1) - as per the last, as it looks OK in the original version.
>
> Page 7 - "for putting images in" makes me cringe. :-/ "for adding images to a wiki page" would be much better.
>
> Page 10 needs some clarifying, as it says "The Wikimedia Commons default is the Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike licence (CC BY-SA), which says that ..." - technically, the description it gives after that is a human-readable summary rather than what the license says, so this needs a bit of rewording to something like 'which explains that' or 'which sets out that'. (Again, I've pointed this out on the file talk page for the original as it's a mistake in that version.)
>
> The "Is it public domain?" section on page 11 could do with some localisation, as right now it's all US-focused rather than relating to the UK. I'd suggest making it clear that the UK is life+70 years, and perhaps also mention the Open Government License?
>
> The back page should probably have WMUK's details and contact information included on it (potentially including the charity and company number), rather than just the WMUK logo and a general description. Also, there's some spelling mistakes: "colelct", "hiostoric". (I'm also fairly sure that 'Wikimedia Foundation' should always be preceded by 'the', but I've never figured out why Americans seem to consistently do this incorrectly...)
>
> Hope this helps. :-)
>
> BTW, do you have an expected lifetime for the booklet before it needs refreshing? I guess things like the visual editor screenshots will age reasonably quickly, and things like the screenshots are already out of date (particularly those of the Commons homepage that quote the number of Commons files as 17,735,052 and 17,801,932, as it's already over 18.1 million now ;-) ).
>
> Thanks,
> Mike

>
> On 22 Aug 2013, at 14:34, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hello again everyone,
>>
>> I've managed to get the InDesign files and have been doing a little work on the brochure. There's now a draft localised version for the UK. This is attached. I really like it but wonder what others think?
>>
>> Andy, I take on board your suggestion about removing the grey background in places but I actually think it adds quite a lot to the design so I've kept it.
>>
>> With regards to freedom of panorama, as mentioned before I know nothing about this so if anyone can take a look at the copy and suggest any appropriate changes I'll take care of it.
>>
>> Hope you like the booklet!
>>
>> Stevie
>>
>>
>> On 14 August 2013 16:37, Martin Poulter <infobomb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why produce a paper brochure? Because of immediacy, e.g. in training sessions it's more convenient for people to have something in front of them to step through rather than opening yet another browser tab. If we want to get our message through to staff in content projects and GLAMs, immediacy may well make the difference when they are being bombarded with recommended links or contacts. Good point about ink though.
>>
>>
>> On 14 August 2013 15:53, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On 7 August 2013 15:37, Daria Cybulska <daria.cybulska@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>> A new brochure about Wikimedia Commons has been produced. Designed to be a companion brochure to the Welcome to Wikipedia brochure, it covers what Commons is, how to upload files, how to use files, and the basics of free licenses - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Illustrating_Wikipedia_brochure.pdf
>>
>> We would like to have a version printed in the UK as well. What are your thoughts on the content?
>>
>> The grey background of some pages will burn up ink if people print their own copies; white would be better.
>>
>> There is a lack of continuity in referring to uploading "images" vs.  "media" - at one point, it says "You can also upload audio", but doesn't mention video
>>
>> It is misleading on freedom of panorama. It says you can upload pictures of "old" buildings, if they're "in the public domain". (It may be wise to mention the difference between FoP in the UK, and in countries where the law is less liberal on the matter.)
>>
>> Environmentally speaking, why produce a paper brochure? Why not put the material online, and hand out business (size) cards with a URL and QR code?
>>
>> Otherwise, a good initiative.
>>
>> --
>> Andy Mabbett
>> @pigsonthewing
>> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr Martin L Poulter
>> Jisc Wikimedia Ambassador, July 2013 - March 2014
>> Wikipedia contributor         http://enwp.org/User:MartinPoulter
>> Volunteer, Wikimedia UK   http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter
>> Musician                          http://soundcloud.com/martin-poulter
>>                                       http://myspace.com/comapilot
>> Person                             http://infobomb.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stevie Benton
>> Communications Organiser
>> Wikimedia UK
>> +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173
>> @StevieBenton
>>
>> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
>> Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
>>

>> <wp_Commons_SHIP_12pp_12aug13 uk reduced.pdf>_______________________________________________

>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org