Hi Fae, Andy, and all

I agree that trying to apply copyright to a 2000 year old item is pretty outrageous, although I'm going to suppose that it stems from ignorance rather than anything else. We have some contacts at the BM although I'm not sure about Tullie House Museum, however I'm happy to contact both institutions, in the first instance, to give them the opportunity to correct this. I'll let you know how I get on. 


On 28 July 2017 at 13:24, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 13:11, Richard Nevell
<richard.nevell@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> Attempting to embarrass the British Museum is misguided and certainly would
> not build bridges for future collaboration.

Perhaps, but as Fae indicates, it might also cause some movement.

What's your - WMUK's, I mean - alternative proposed action?

Andy Mabbett

Wikimedia UK mailing list
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk


Lucy Crompton-Reid

Chief Executive

Wikimedia UK

+44 (0) 207 065 0991


Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.

Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.