They misrepresent the role of admins, too, which is to enact the will of
On Sep 8, 2012 1:11 PM, "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Was anyone approached to give the other side of the story? The article
lacks any explanation of our policy on reliable sources. It sounds like our
policy was followed correctly - the author's statement was accepted as
reliable only one it was published - but the BBC don't seem to have asked
what the policy is.
Wikimedia UK mailing list