> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2008/9/12 Sam Korn <smoddy@gmail.com>:
> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I understand your concerns, but what's the alternative?
> >>
> >> Something other than approval voting -- either simply "support" voting
> >> or a ranking system.
> >>
> >> That seems unnecessary to me, however.
> >
> > What is "support voting"? Any kind of preferential voting is far too
> > complicated to be worth it in our case - you generally end up needing
> > a computer program to calculate the results (or a hell of a lot of
> > post it notes!).
>
> I was meaning a simple lack of opposition. Maybe I am
> misunderstanding what is currently the proposal?
>

Me, Geni and andrew will discuss what options we have. We will then
draw up the final election methods. Clear them with the community, then
run the election. Unless we can get access to the software used for the
foundation board elections, it will most likely be run via email.

---

Get Hotmail on your mobile from Vodafone Try it Now