Also watched it with interest, I was also shaking my head when she said that free editing had been a &#39;mirage&#39; all along. I think the point that this was just a short trial and was not something that would come quickly was not emphasised enough, but meh.<br>
<br>But yes, I certainly would not be brave enough to step up and talk about FlaggedRevs. Great work, David. :)<br><br>- Chris<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Thomas Dalton <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:thomas.dalton@gmail.com">thomas.dalton@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Well done, David, good work! It&#39;s a pity you weren&#39;t able to emphasise<br>
the &quot;this is better than what we had before&quot; point more, but at least<br>
you managed to mention it. However, it sounded like the plan was to<br>
have all BLPs flag protected, but I don&#39;t see that on the description<br>
of the trial. In fact, it doesn&#39;t seem to mention it having anything<br>
to do with BLPs other than BLP being one of the policies an article<br>
needs to satisfy to be flagged.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wikimedia UK mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org">wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l" target="_blank">http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l</a><br>
WMUK: <a href="http://uk.wikimedia.org" target="_blank">http://uk.wikimedia.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>