That might actually be licensed, though.

--
Harry

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Richard Farmbrough <richard@farmbrough.co.uk> wrote:
I wonder if http://www.popartuk.com/photography/london/red-bus-on-westminster-bridge-ph0408-poster.asp would have been considered enough to make the idea non-novel.


On 25/01/2012 22:23, geni wrote:
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske<magnusmanske@googlemail.com>  wrote:
...photos that somehow look similar:

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html

The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but
should people in the UK be concerned when uploading images?


Magnus
Nothing new here. Its always been understood that in theory if you see
a photo and take another photo that is similar enough to it to be
considered a derivative work that that is a copyright violation.
However in most cases it would be extremely hard to prove and people
don't care enough to try.



_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org