If people on-wiki are being snitty, I'd recommend going straight to
OTRS, Via them the charity can point out relevant links to counter any
undue weight as-opposed to trying to remove content.
It does carry a lot more weight if OTRS volunteers bring up legitimate
new sources on the talk and ask these incorporated to eliminate any
bias.
Brian McNeil
--
Wikinews, Accredited Reporter. Personal: brian.mcneil(a)o2.co.uk
"Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news."
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Charity outreach favour
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
Date: Fri, August 12, 2011 4:58 pm
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
If you don't find any luck here, OTRS are good at this kind of thing.
On 12 August 2011 17:39, Chris Keating <chriskeatingwiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
A charity I know is trying to update its wikipedia entry to deal with what
they see as a case of WP:UNDUE, and finding they are getting snapped at
on-wiki.
I was wondering if someone might be prepared to help them find appropriate
ways of improving the article.
I would offer myself if the charity concerned wasn't my employer ;-)
If you can help, please drop me a line.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org