On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Well, if WS is paying for proofing ... I do about 35 hours a week currently, so I'd be interested. Seriously, WS doesn't have the sort of profile (point 1) that is likely to attract this sort of support. But also (point 2) WS is in a more crowded market than WP, given that there are other and indeed larger text repositories and ways to get proofreading done.
Viz "attracting this sort of support", I meant from Wikimedia UK. That way WMUK would be able to deliver an end-to-end service within a defined time period.
I appreciate that it may be that WMUK would get maximum value for money using an alternative service, but then importing the results.
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250).