On 28 June 2013 16:23, Simon Knight <sjgknight(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I basically agree with Katherine, Gordo I’m not sure
what benefits you
think members *should *get? Why are you a member? ****
I like the way the page is a sort of a positioning statement regarding
what it means for you to – a little description of why people might choose
to be a member v. a volunteer v. some other sort of supporter. That
doesn’t have to be about benefits so much as the level and type of support
people want to show, and the kinds of activity they might engage in.
Having said that, I think the micro-grants thing is a good benefit which as
I understand is only open to members (is that also true of claiming
costs?). ****
The argument that someone who could usefully apply for a microgrant (an
engaged
activist) is a typical member is a time-honoured fallacy in this
discussion.
Charles