Mike,
I think it was my fault mis-reading your original message. My apologies.
Deryck

On 10 March 2012 21:22, Michael Peel <michael.peel@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
On second thoughts/read-through, I want to retract my previous email. I skim-read through Tom's email, and was thinking more in terms of 'Wikimedia Commons' vs ''Commons' in terms of 'House of Commons', and hence there being high-profile visibility for the Wikimedia sister projects. I was _not_ replying in terms of the 'Page 3' interpretation as per the newspaper that goes under the name of 'The Sun', which I think is fundamentally sexist and ethically wrong.

Mike

On 9 Mar 2012, at 16:03, Deryck Chan wrote:

> Yes, hence I think it's time for page 3 to start taking good pictures *from* Commons! ;)
>
> On Mar 9, 2012 3:56 PM, "Richard Symonds" <richard.symonds@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
> I think there are probably enough page 3 photos on commons already, don't you? ;-)
> Richard Symonds
> Office & Development Manager
> Wikimedia UK
>
> +44 (0) 207 065 0992
>
> --
> Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable Company
> Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827. Charity No:1144513 Office: 4th Floor, Development House,  56-64 Leonard Street,
> London EC2A 4LT.
> Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate
> Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an independent non-profit
> organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for
> its contents.
>
>
> On 09/03/2012 15:52, Deryck Chan wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2012 2:35 PM, "Michael Peel" <michael.peel@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:32, Tom Morris wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 9 March 2012 13:48, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> > >> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/who-are-the-commons-moles-changing-wikipedia-entries-7545991.html
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Headline: "Who are the Commons moles changing Wikipedia entries?"
>> > >
>> > > My initial thought was "Commons people aren't allowed to edit
>> > > Wikipedia?" (and also something along the lines of "well, we know
>> > > Commons people like their 'nude or semi-nude women with Muppets', but
>> > > even so, calling them 'moles' seems a bit harsh!").
>> > >
>> > > Then I grokked that it was the House of Commons, not Wikimedia Commons.
>> > >
>> > > Too much time at the coal face, methinks.
>> >
>> > I thought exactly the same thing, followed by "ooh, there's a Wikimedia Commons article on page 3 of the Independent! Fantastic!". Should have known better. ;-)
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>>
>> What I read: "There's a Wikimedia Commons picture on page 3!" Anyone takers on Commons for the challenge? ;)
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> > wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>> > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>
>> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>
>> WMUK:
>> http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org