On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:19 +0100, Tom Holden wrote:
Al (Majorly) knows Paul's identity and is
satisfied with his
qualifications and suitability for the job, which is enough for me.
I'm not sure it's constructive for people to keep pushing this.
The only thing I've seen Al mentioned on this list is that he think he
knows who Paul is on-wiki, nothing on the questions about prior
experience. Though since it was the first time I have commented on this
subject / ask those questions yesterday (note Alison: hard to define
someone as stalking when it was the first time that person has asked
about something), it is possible Al has be in private conversation with
those that has asked before indicating his satisfaction.
I am not actually suggesting Paul is not qualified for the job. For all
I know, he is, and is working very hard in getting the bank account open
and the company getting charitable status.
It's simple questions. If Paul didn't for whatever reasons want to
answer it, he only need to say so, and when it come time for
(re-)election, people will judge on their own with or without that
information. However, don't be surprised if some people isn't satisfied
with a "I know, not going to tell you, just trust me", whoever that
might be (rest of the Board / Al / ...).
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine