I believe the website and the report are different - the report itself, on page three, states the following:

This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.

Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).

Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.


On 8 July 2016 at 15:02, Andy Mabbett <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 8 July 2016 at 01:51, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.neko@gmail.com> wrote:

> It can be argued that the current copyright obfuscates the general public's
> access to the report.

How so?

> I do feel that any single email from us would be promptly ignored as there
> probably is a large volume of emails. It may be prudent to either start a
> petition (for the Parliament) or ask a few MPs to raise the copyright issue
> in the Parliament.

Petitioning for what? The report is already under the CC-by compatible
Open Government Licence 3.0

> First of, the websites terms and conditions do not explicitly release the
> works under a free license.[1]

No, the report's licence is on the pages of the report itself.

> Moreover it mentions BSkyB, BBC and ITN as copyright holders of some of the
> documents. Any migration to Wikisource must filter out such content.

Are your referring to inclusions in the report, or to other content on
the inquiry website?

> Lastly there are a number of now declassified documents that provide vital
> evidence to reinforce the reports findings, these too need to be freely
> licensed.

AIUI, they are (albeit with understandable redactions).

--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk