I have a preference for the Schulze method as well, since it is generally superior to many other methods, even if somewhat opaque in its mechanism. Examining the comparisons at
should give an indication of its strengths.
The only problem is likely to be finding a good implementation in software. There is a refinement of Schulze described at the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_STV which has a python implementation at https://github.com/bradbeattie/python-vote-core/blob/master/pyvotecore/schulze_stv.py but more interestingly, an online voting service at https://modernballots.com/
On 17/09/2012 23:03, James Farrar wrote:Well, the WMF use the Schulze method  for its board election so that could be considered as an option.
Certainly my sense of the various discussions over the past 18 months is
that there's near-consensus on STV as the best alternative to the
current system. I intend to draft a motion with new election rules for
STV; if anyone has other systems they'd like to put forward I'll be
happy to draft election rules for them.
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
Wikimedia UK mailing list