Hi Steve,

You certainly could have a more nuanced policy, and use more images as a result!

I'd guess the reasons you might be cautious are:

- Commons has a good number of files it that are in the public domain in the US, but may not be in the UK (assuming that public domain-UK is sufficient for the BBC to make use of something)

- Commons also has a good number of files which we believe are public domain (at least in the US) but where someone still asserts copyright from "sweat of the brow" rights (this set overlapping with the previous one a fair bit)

- Some images might simply have been mis-attributed by whoever uploaded them to Commons and are actually in copyright (probably a much smaller group than the first 2)

Of course, these kinds of issues aren't unique to Wikimedia Commons, any open image source could have the same problems - so if you are taking PD images from Flickr or elsewhere on the Internet, then you shouldn't have a blanket bank on Wikimedia Commons!

Paid photography sources potentially have the opposite problem, in that you can end up paying royalties for images that you think actually are in the public domain.

As Charles says, it's usually possible to come to an informed judgement based on what the Commons page for a given file says, but this needs a reasonable level of awareness of copyright law. I'm not sure if there is any kind of "user-friendly" summary at the minute, but there probably should be - I'm asking around...

Hope this helps,

Chris

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Steve Bowbrick <steve.bowbrick@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

Hi all,

Very occasional post from a long-time subscriber here!

I run social media for the BBC's speech and classical radio stations and for some of the BBC's classical brands (orchestras, Proms etc.).

We have a constant need for images. We use the usual mixed bag of sources: commercial picture libraries, the BBC archive, commissioned photos, some public domain and cc sources.

We have a pretty cast-iron rule forbidding the use of Wikimedia Commons images. Historically, we've felt that there was sufficient uncertainty about the ownership of some Commons images that it would be safest for us to steer clear all together (sometimes, for instance, we find images in commercial libraries like Hulton Getty that are also in the Commons and this creates the kind of doubt about ownership that stops us from using them).

So, in the interests of updating my knowledge (and possibly our policy), is there any up-to-date advice for organisations like the BBC about the safe usage of content from the Wikimedia Commons? Should we rely on Commons images more often? Is there any guidance for how to judge the ownership of a Commons image reliably? And what's Wikipedia's policy about the use of these images in entries?

Thank you!

s

--
Social media for BBC Radio 3, Radio 4, 4 Extra, Proms, classical...
07718 120 073
http://twitter.com/bowbrick

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk