Thanks Andreas for that. A few comments in-line for some corrections - Stevie can you contact them?

On 8 February 2013 17:20, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466@gmail.com> wrote:

Press coverage:

http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/Governance/article/1170282/review-urges-major-overhaul-governance-wikimedia-uk/

1) Using the WMF logo instead of Wikimedia UK one (do we allow use of logos for press purposes?)

2) "The review, commissioned by Wikimedia UK and its sister charity in the US, theWikimedia Foundation, " - the WMF and WMUK are independent organisations, is sister charity appropriate?

http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_trustees_have_been_too_involved_to_govern_the_charity

1) This logo is cropped at the bottom slightly - again do we allow use of logos for press purposes, and should they be full logos?

2) "or editing of the UK Wikipedia site." - I believe this should be English Wikipedia?

3) The article links to http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/directory/company/3377/wikimedia_foundation which gives the WMUK logo and address, but the Foundation's name and website (see the Description tab too)

Thehelpfulone

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Thehelpfulone