Geocodes, ah yes, probably guilty there.

I read through the thing twice and clicked various links before deciding I was going to have to ask what the connection was between Kinlochleven.jpg and genocide. And yes I agree that the whole thing is a bit too Geocodey and dry - if anyone fancies improving it dont worry about it being in userspace. Oh and trust me, if you get a newbie who is nervous about changing an article, asking them to choose which picture to use and getting them to transform articles with pictures is very empowering.

There's also pretty much zero risk of newbies getting edit conflicts or being bitten by patrollers.

On 9 March 2016 at 16:36, Katherine Bavage <katherine.bavage@gmail.com> wrote:

Typo! But, also, yes lets not train newbies to add images of genocide :/

Anyway, lets head off a debate about how much genocide is too much...thanks Jonathan, that's handy :)

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 at 16:34 Gordon Joly <gordon.joly@pobox.com> wrote:

On 09/03/16 16:32, Richard Symonds wrote:
> I think that word is "geocode", rather than genocide. But yes, if the
> word was genocide, then yes, that would be too genocidey.
>

Are you sure?

Gordo

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk