On 17/09/12 23:23, rexx wrote:
He's mistaken. There is no mechanism in place for
from the domains qrpedia.org
<http://qrpedia.org> and qrwp.org
<http://qrwp.org>. Commentators also need to differentiate between the
site (which physically hosts the servers) and the domain names. WMUK's
interest in QRpedia is in finding ways to ensure that the service
provided remains secure and free in perpetuity.
But surely the domains are hard
coded in the QRPedia codes? Therefore it
is both the domain name and the server that make up the service?
I have lost a domain in the past, and just got it back within the grace
period. It was not my fault.....but it was not pretty.
Income? Interesting. Somebody could fork Wikipedia and start making