On 1/23/06, Anthere <Anthere9@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gordon Joly wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK we find past meetings
>> listed as follows:
>>
>>     * 9th October 2005: London
>>     * 16th October 2005: IRC
>>     * 13th November 2005: IRC
>>     * 27th November 2005: London
>>     * 15th January 2006: London
>>
>
>
> And Jimbo was present at the 27th November meeting.
>
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:The_Royal_Oak_bootstrap_meet.jpg
>
> :-)
>
> Gordon

Well, if Jimbo is the Foundation, there is no problem then ?

Maybe I need to be a little bit more clearer.
Right now, we are trying to coordinate actions done by the various
chapters. This implies a bunch of things, including communication on
what we do and where we have problems. *We* being at the same time the
Foundation AND chapters. This is also why we have a local chapter
coordinator in charge of facilitation communication between chapters and
between chapters and foundation. Would it be possible that that channel
of communication be also used ?

Otherwise, good luck on the creation. Yes, all bylaws are different...
we are learning :-)

ant

ant


Yes, channels of communication seemed to be slightly more open before we stuck our collective heads into the practical issues of UK law, since when it's all been taking place on this mailing list and in face to face meetings. I'm sorry if you feel out of the loop, Anthere, that's certainly not my intention anyway. I also agree that the foundation is bigger than Jimbo, I suppose Gordon was just trying to indicate that we've had *some* input from *a* foundation point of view (but which you obviously also knew about). However, Delphine's back in the conversation now (hooray!) and I'll now address her bafflement briefly.