I believe the applicable case law is Arkell v. Pressdram.

On 21 May 2011 20:10, "Brian McNeil" <brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 19:49 +0100, James Farrar wrote:
>> I heard an except from an interview with Jimbo on BBC London radio
>> this afternoon; paraphrasing, his attitude was because the name has
>> been named in reliable US sources, US editors will ensure it stays in
>> enwiki.
>
> Something I stumbled across today:
>
> http://www.city-law.net/news/2010/Wikipedia_article.htm
>
> So, it'll stay in - sure. However, someone in the US may well have to
> ask for legal assistance (EFF, ACLU?) in - via the Foundation - telling
> an out-of-touch man in a white, powdered wig and dress to,.... "eff
> orf!".
>
>
> --
> Brian McNeil.
> --
> brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org | Wikinews Accredited Reporter.
> http://en.wikinews.org | http://www.wikinewsie.org
> "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news".
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org