On 27/06/07, Sean Whitton <sean(a)silentflame.com> wrote:
I guess it's sad to see that you have been forced
into a 'fake' AGM
purely to meet requirements, but that's the way things are I suppose.
It'd be nicer if the real GM was the AGM, but having a tick-the-box
AGM and an EGM for the launch isn't really a problem.
Now to keep working on the charitable status problem ... *zzzzzz*
- d.