Dear Mr. Mundol, Thank you for sharing this document. A couple of typos not withstanding, it is very well written and makes for a highly informative and compelling read to new eyes like mine. The broad scope of the report and the depth of details enumerated while capturing the on-going story of Wikipedia in India is very welcome indeed from the point of view of record-keeping, internal reflection and public relations. Best regards, punditcomment From: hisham(a)wikimedia.org Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 02:58:57 +0530 To: wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Presenting "The India Chronicles" Hi Folks, A few months ago, the Foundation asked Tory Read to travel to India and listen and learn and write about the movement in India. The objective was to harvest experiences and learnings and to have an open discussion around what we could all do to further the movement. This isn't in the form of a (possibly) long & boring report - but in the form of a story. (Tory's a professional researcher, writer and former journalist.) To put this together, Tory travelled for a couple of weeks across Mumbai, Pune, Bangalore and across towns in Kerala - attending community meet-ups and meeting up/speaking with a host of individual community members (in these cities and indeed beyond.) Tory's tale is called, "The India Chronicles", and is available on Wikimedia Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_India_Chronicles_(150dpi).pdf Do have a read through and do share your views on it - positives and negatives - and do feel free to comment on any aspect of it. It would be wonderful to have an engaging conversation on this. Warmest Regards, hisham _______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

So I read it and then re-read it and for the most part, the journey has been well captured. At least for the period in time from when I have been associated with this wonderful community. There is something that struck me though. Now that the journey and the story has been captured in the written form, in many ways, this *will* form the back story to the Indian community and Wikimedia movement. I'm wondering how comfortable everyone is with that? Thank you. Best, Gautam ________ http://blog.prathambooks.org/p/social-media.html

On 9 October 2011 15:36, BalaSundaraRaman <sundarbecse(a)yahoo.com> wrote: I agree Sundar. What I meant was that this particular narrative is now the only one committed to paper (as it were) and will be crawled and indexed and searched and read and referenced and since it is the only narrative that is discoverable, outside the Community that is, it will tend towards being the default one in my opinion. Thank you. Best, Gautam ________ http://blog.prathambooks.org/p/social-media.html

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:39 PM, BalaSundaraRaman <sundarbecse(a)yahoo.com>wrote;wrote: I think Tory did a great job and had her finger on the pulse, and I do see your larger point too. So I think one good way forward in general - and this doesn't hold only for wikipedia, but for history making in general - is for others to start documenting and writing histories too. Either of individual indic language wikipedias, or alternate views of the same thing. It's always good to have multiple accounts of the same period/s or phenomenon/s, seen through different eyes and lenses, if only to ensure that there is no one official history. In that spirit, I do think the first edition of the community newsletter (published in 2010), subsequent editions of the newsletter, and Gautam's article in Critical Point of View are also vital narratives of wikipedia in India, that tell parts of the story. Hopefully, these are easily accessible, online atleast. Which is my way of saying that I don't see Tory's narrative as the official one, and the others as unofficial. For me, they all tell parts of the story through their own lenses. Cheers Bishakha

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Gautam John <gautam(a)prathambooks.org>wrote;wrote: and what dominates - and maybe what's seen as definitive too. While one narrative may dominate in the short run, in the medium and long terms the existence of multiple narratives usually does ensure that no single POV can rule. (look at all the voices and multiple perspectives around Steve Jobs' passing). Agree that power is also part of the equation: whose voice? whose narrative? who puts it out? And I think part of it is how we choose to see it and who/what we choose to hear - if I choose to see Tory's piece as dominant because it was commissioned by the Foundation, then that determines how much power I give it. If I decide it is an interesting chronicle of a moment in time, then it becomes 'a' version, not 'the' version. Also: want to second Hisham in suggesting that people add their comments on Tory's piece, since that too is the intention. And I'm bowing out of this now, since I'm on a flight with lots of time to spare and could go on and on and on. :) Cheers Bishakha

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 23:23, Gautam John <gautam(a)prathambooks.org> wrote: Agree, It was a quite an elaborate one. I would treat her history just like a "Wikipedia page" having bunch of references.Gone are the days when people relied on one document to get narrative and am not sure if it would be worthier effort to keep documenting "open communities" which document itself periodically. Like we have the list archives, village pumps, millions of other publically crawl-able pages on internet that anyone who wants to know can always dig and get more. Wait for few more years, you will have history.li like paper.li which can digest and create personal accounts of history on subjects intelligently, automatically given the public sources. I hope we dont need Oral citations for this "page" ;) ;) , What say Aachal? -- Regards Srikanth.L