I actively organize Bangalore Meetups and support several others .. Should I be worrying whether I am doing as a chapter member, board member or a community member?
By a matter of principle, chapter and community volunteers are just... volunteers. Paid consultants are hired to executive specific programs, and hence the results of their work and reports should be presented with clarity. Simply "supporting" something does not clarify the extent of their involvement.
As with Assam meetup recently, coordinated by Shiju, some of the expenses were met from a personal grant from the Foundation to me & Shiju.
There was a recent Malayalam Wiki Academy in Bangalore organised by Malayalam Community. Some of them are also Chapter members. People like me and Naveen actively helped the event ..Are we doing as chapter board member or community member? We don't really know.. But we are just genuinely helping the movement, with worrying about what capacity we are doing it.
I don't think it's a good idea to separate the chapter and the community. The chapter is a membership-based organization and by definition an umbrella organization which represents the community. There is no reason for differentiation as long as it is volunteer work done by a chapter member.
The various academies that we do, some of the requests comes directly to the chapter, community or India programs, but each supporting each other in different capacities.
Now Noopur is a GLAM Champion, Chapter member and Delhi SIG Chair and also part of Chapter Communications Team. She now also heads the Communication & PR for the India Programs.
As I explained, it is difficult to separate the contributions of different entities or individuals for the Wikimedia movement in India.
IMHO, we should be only concerned about the outcomes of the event and not who gets the credit.
Even though the possibility of interfacing each other is high for different entities and groups of volunteers working in India, there is a need for differentiation and it is a question which cannot be avoided. The volunteers who work on their pet-projects while not being associated with any of the entities are not expected to be as accountable as (i) the chapter which receives or may receive grants from the Wikimedia Foundation and donations from individuals and organizations in the country AND (ii) the WMF India Programs which is run by multiple paid consultants.
So I don't see why we shouldn't care about differentiation, or why it may be an undesirable thing to want to differentiate. Ultimately we all want results, yes, but we also need to understand causality because there are significant amount of funds involved. We need to differentiate because there are different degrees of accountability involved both with the chapter, the WMF India Programs and the volunteer who works with a grant.
Hope this helps.