Subha,

To clarify further:

* This is a good project.

* I don't mind whether you spend your personal time or official time for this.

* Issues regarding denial of contribution requests doens't fit in this discussion.

My issue is when you asked me to contribute for this, I saw you as a community member and contributed.

But, I was shocked to see this reported as a CIS-A2K project later. I might have even contributed knowing that but not revealing that in advance is a serious disappointment. I am not sure how many other contributors were informed of the CIS-A2K affiliation.

Here is another instance where CIS-A2K claims affiliation to this work:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/The_Centre_for_Internet_and_Society/Proposal_form#Q10

My request is simple:

EITHER declare this affiliation in the Twitter page.

OR stop mentioning this as a CIS-A2K initiative anywhere.

Ravi