Subha,
To clarify further:
* This is a good project.
* I don't mind whether you spend your personal time or official time for
this.
* Issues regarding denial of contribution requests doens't fit in this
discussion.
My issue is when you asked me to contribute for this, I saw you as a
community member and contributed.
But, I was shocked to see this reported as a CIS-A2K project later. I might
have even contributed knowing that but not revealing that in advance is a
serious disappointment. I am not sure how many other contributors were
informed of the CIS-A2K affiliation.
Here is another instance where CIS-A2K claims affiliation to this work:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/…
My request is simple:
EITHER declare this affiliation in the Twitter page.
OR stop mentioning this as a CIS-A2K initiative anywhere.
Ravi