As mentioned here[1], please conduct anonymous community survey. Please
elaborate more how and when you intend to do this with the help of WMF and
Community.
As I understand from the above you are asking about the participatory and
continuous mode of evaluation as part of which we proposed two tools (and
none talked about anonymity). One is to have a "Community Advisory Team"
(CAT) and the second to have a "Quarterly Community Survey" (QCS). We
quickly realized that we were very ambitious while suggesting these tools,
however unfortunately there is not appreciable progress on these :( With
regard to having a CAT we have tried our best in encouraging the community
members but not much enthusiasm was shown. In fact this is one of the key
learning and a challenge that we discussed here [4]. Of the 5 focus
languages, except for Telugu Wikimedia community, which has done a sort of
introspection [5], a systematic community driven evaluation could not be
done in the rest. Yes, QCS is a pending action item and I would get back to
the WMF with a reminder on this. It will be great to hear from you and
others on how one could develop this tool.
Thanks. WMF conducts surveys with the help of this
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com site, i think it'd be great to conduct
surveys which can gather feedback in general and on particular events like
TTT where users/members (and participants for particular events like TTT)
can share their thoughts/views, rank the works on various parameter on the
scale of 1 to 5, onymously or anonymously. I think many would prefer to
take part in the surveys anonymously, so it should be optional.
Through surveys with the help of bot we can reach to many more folks and
get feedback easily.
Ansuman
>
> [1]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/India_Access_To_Knowledge/Work_plan_April_2…
> [2]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:India_Access_To_Knowledge/Work_plan_Ap…
> [3]
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:India_Access_To_Knowledge/Reports/CIS-…
> [4]
http://bit.ly/IAepxV
> [5]
http://bit.ly/IAuiVi
>