WhereDevilsDare,
rightly said, it is our money, the government is elected to represent the people.
As a side note:
This might be of interest to you:
Flickr help states:
Note: If your login ID is based in Singapore, Hong Kong, India, Korea or with Maktoob.com you will only be able to view safe content based on your local Terms of Service (this means you won’t be able to turn SafeSearch off). If your login ID is based in Germany you are not able to view restricted content due to your local Terms of Service.
Is the Government censoring stuff?
I feel this could also affect Wikipedia and the Commons.
Maybe this could be clubbed with the railways thing from the previous thread?
--Regards,


On 18 June 2011 22:10, <wheredevelsdare@hotmail.com> wrote:
Very contentious issue Pranesh. The issue is not only this - but also to insure that any Indian government works be in public domain as well as that of a Public Servant when on duty (like in the US - after all it is OUR govenment and OUR money spent hiring that Public Servant!).
 
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:04:07 +0200
From: pranesh@cis-india.org
To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
CC: aprabhala@gmail.com; sunil@cis-india.org
Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Massive increase in copyright term for photographs


Dear all,
It seems clear that through a new amendment to the Copyright Act, the
term of copyright of photographs is going to be increased from 25 years
(which is the minimum required by international copyright law) to 60
years *after the death of the photographer* (i.e., copyright term = life
of the photographer + 60 years).

So say a photographer aged 25 clicks a photograph and dies at the age of
75 (in 2061):
Under current law the copyright on that photo expires on January 1, 2037.
Under proposed law, copyright on that photo expires on January 1, 2122.

The difference: 85 years!

(I hope I've done the math correctly.)

So only your great-grandchildren will be able to upload that photograph
to Wikipedia.

As far as I can understand, there has been no positive lobbying on this
front by any photographers. No one has really asked for it.

We, from the Centre for Internet and Society submitted a 'civil society
submission' (with the backing of 22 organizations) which criticised this
to the Standing Committee that was examining the amendment. But the
chairman of that committee did not take notice. In effect, the Standing
Committee heard only rightsholders (and groups, including ours, working
on the exception for persons with disabilities).

Are people on this list concerned about this? If yes, then we all need
to try to get this particular amendment targetted and struck off when
the amendment gets presented before Parliament in the Monsoon session.

Regards,
Pranesh

--
Pranesh Prakash
Programme Manager
Centre for Internet and Society
W: http://cis-india.org | T: +91 80 40926283


_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l

_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l




--
Regards,
ME.
Wear a Lungi, Support the Movement
 My infrastructure invasion... plus other images
too.. on Wikimedia Commons. http://bit.ly/d50SIq