On Wednesday 14 November 2012 10:04 PM, Theo10011 wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:35 PM, praveenp <me.praveen@gmail.com> wrote:

Apology: I am not from Indus Valley and not even a north Indian; I don't know whether I am allowed to write here. ;-)  Anyway I am posting because this may affect so many languages, including those "True Indian" Indus Vally languages. :-p

There's no need for that kind of rhetoric. I don't think even Anirudh identifies himself as a "North Indian", I might on the other hand, and I haven't made any statements against you.

If it helps, you are all more "True Indian"(s) than I am. This is a silly point that is turning political, please try not to inflame the discussion any further.
If this is a warning, if you need, I can afraid :-). From your reply, I understand that even a "not much true Indian" like you know this is inflammable. And you also know that most people are not going to agree with it.

Unlike your replay to the thread, my main concern was about ULS. But, I cannot help myself from poking those who try to use thread for being a pundit using some negligible differences.:-)

My point was, well said by many others in the other thread.