On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:45 AM, CherianTinu Abraham <tinucherian@gmail.com> wrote:
Although page depth was not really connected with the current trend,  Personally, I think page depth is no longer a reliable metric for comparison, here is why I think so.

Assamese Wikipedia ( 312 articles) : page depth is 339 . 
Sindi ( 355 articles): 381

Compare this with 
Bengali ( 22,062 articles) : 374
Malayalam ( 16,414 articles) : 320

It is self-explanatory...

Technically 1 million edits is a cute milestone ( congrats to ml wiki) to take notice, but we cannot consider it as real metric for comparison among Wikipedias. There are language Wikipedias where Google translation/Machine translations or bot created articles are banned or controlled tightly. There are Wikipedias, where they have a free run. Please note that I am not saying taht they are either good or bad. There are Wikipedias where constant updation of articles happening, due a vibrant Wikicommunity. There are Wikipedians who like to work on the articles offline and then bring it live with a single edit. 

Having said that, it is advisable to do what each community feels best for their language Wikipedia. Of course, it is good to have an healthy competition :)

But everybody, please do continue to report such interesting milestones and statistics. We all love that..

Agree with Tinu. Congratulations on the progress though. Indeed, it is good to have healthy competition.

--
Hari Prasad Nadig
http://hpnadig.net | http://twitter.com/hpnadig
http://flickr.com/hpnadig