Dear all, In personal capacity, just offering a small clarification. I agree that chapter and IP as organizational entities should have their roles defined and their reports tabulated. This is a very desirable and healthy practice imho.
Regarding my role as SIG, GLAM person, member of the Chapter communications and Foundation consultant, I believe it is not so much a case of conflicting roles but a matter of fewer people around. I am already working on weekends as volunteer (in the museum and as SIG) and do not want to be dissociated from the chapter communications team because I sincerely look up to Tinu as a mentor. However, this is just my personal opinion.
Thank you
Warm regards
Noopur
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Hisham
<hisham@wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Pradeep Mohandas wrote:
hi,
I don't think all events will fall so neatly into categories. I do not
want to see a situation where Chapter and Foundation wrestle for any
event.
I agree, Pradeep. Having said that, the problem we are currently grappling with (and I think will continue to do so for the foreseeable future) is one of too much work and too little hands. There is too much to do and no dearth of opportunities - and therefore there ought to be no cause for "wrestling." However, the India Chapter and India Program must (continue to) work at communicating and collaborating effectively. I also think we should share these collaborations stories more impactfully to the community - to bring them to life for the community.
hisham
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
--
Noopur Raval
Student
Arts and Aesthetics
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Ph: 9650567690