The biggest irony is how our news publications summarized the titles :
The so called research "finds" that " 60 % of the respondents found that their company articles on Wikipedia having factual errors" ..
But our new agencies conclude that "60 % of the Wikipedia entries contain factual errors" !

Anyways don't expect any sympathies from the PR industry towards Wikipedia ! :)

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Srikanth Lakshmanan <srik.lak@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 14:32, CherianTinu Abraham <tinucherian@gmail.com> wrote:
IANS : 60% Wikipedia entries contain factual errors

Wonderful report I have ever seen. 6th grade kid would do far better in what is called comprehending the original statement. The irony is it talks of "factual errors".

"" In fact, 60% of respondents who were familiar with their company or recent client’s Wikipedia article indicated that it article contained factual errors."" --> The actual statement from page 20 of the "research report"[1].   

Who were the people who responded? PR professionals, yes people who try to promote a brand / entity for money. End of the day its about Paid editing.

[1] http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Documents/2012DiStaso.pdf

--
Regards
Srikanth.L

_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l