Sorry for this delayed reply.
On Thursday 28 November 2013 04:52 PM,
share these with a fresh email.
Only thing that makes sense is updates made to the Team page.
Other changes you made so far are not inclined with this[ 1]
The numbers shown here  are not inclined with Evaluation
tools shown here ?
These reports don't show any evaluation and outcome of the
A2K's work. Thus all your replies to me seem meaningless.
Though we had put out a draft of the Work-plans in April 2013, the
community review and WMF approval took some time (i.e. until July
2013). Also many activities as per the plans began operational from
July. We are committed to undertaking the quarterly review exercise
as per the parameters set out here , but from July onwards. This
has been mentioned here too . We are currently working towards
sharing this for the period July-Sept. 2013. For the period until
June 2013 we believe we have shared a comprehensive report here .
As mentioned here, please conduct anonymous community
survey. Please elaborate more how and when you intend to do
this with the help of WMF and Community.
As I understand from the above you are asking about the
participatory and continuous mode of evaluation as part of which we
proposed two tools (and none talked about anonymity). One is to have
a "Community Advisory Team" (CAT) and the second to have a
"Quarterly Community Survey" (QCS). We quickly realized that we were
very ambitious while suggesting these tools, however unfortunately
there is not appreciable progress on these :( With regard to
having a CAT we have tried our best in encouraging the community
members but not much enthusiasm was shown. In fact this is one of
the key learning and a challenge that we discussed here . Of the
5 focus languages, except for Telugu Wikimedia community, which has
done a sort of introspection , a systematic community driven
evaluation could not be done in the rest. Yes, QCS is a pending
action item and I would get back to the WMF with a reminder on this.
It will be great to hear from you and others on how one could
develop this tool.