I think what logic means is we need to weigh input and output. Since our resources are limited, I think its a fair analysis.

A biryani lover will not go to Hyderabad just to eat biryani, but if a biryani lover is in Hyderabad, he will definitely indulge in Hyderabadi biryani. i.e. If we knew it was going to be this way, Sohan need not have gone there, Srikanth R could have managed the show - and there definitely wasnt any need for paperwork, couldv been informal. Anyways, its a learning curve.


Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:44:27 +0530
From: noopur.raval@gmail.com
To: wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediaindia-l] The Great NITT fiasco ...

I've read your reply very carefully and that is why I am suggesting a change in paradigm. Eventually, your comments reflect on the main question: was it worth it? And, I am merely suggesting that we will have to start looking at "worth" differently than time consumed. 

Regarding the chapter signing an MoU, I wasn't even aware of this and am frankly quite surprised they managed to sign one so quickly. I will refrain from commenting on that. 

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Srikanth Lakshmanan <srik.lak@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 18:40, Noopur <noopur.raval@gmail.com> wrote:
I think the question regarding outreach is being framed in a wrong light here.The problem seriously is not about "what is the point of spending X hours?". The point is, are we making the most of those hours? Do we as a community need to improve (dumb things down, use better methods) our strategies of communication so that we don't waste a lot of our time and still get results. IMHO, it is way too early to expect 1-2 editors to be recruited out of all such events because Wikipedia movement is  too nascent in India to make immediate sense to people. So, there will be at least 1-2 years of just conversation before everyone knows that "Wikipedia can be edited". That is why I strongly believe that we need to keep doing these sessions. 

Noopur,

Care to read my reply once more before misunderstanding? Where have I questioned the need for outreach on the mail? I specifically mentioned *(Effectiveness is totally another thing)* --> which means I am not even talking about effectiveness here, even though I have alternate views on outreach. My sadness was all these things was done for 1 hour slot? Chapter spending time to sign MoU might take atleast 1 hour for Naveen & Co, atleast 10 people planning/mailing in the run up to the event where we have a 1 hour slot. Is that worthy? Enlighten me. I also mentioned the amount of time that was spent last year(again not uttering a word on the effectivity / need of it). Thanks for your understanding.

--
Regards
Srikanth.L

_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l




--
Noopur Raval
Student
Arts and Aesthetics
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Ph: 9650567690


_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l