Hi,

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:20 PM, jeph <jephpaul@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

@Pratik Lahoti
Edit count is far from a perfect measure of editor contribution :-). It is just one of many metrics we could use. As such it also depends on an editors style, small/frequent edits to few/big edits. Sorting the list by edit count may not present the right picture. Would love to hear what you think.

Yeah, you are right. That would depend on the editor style. But as a viewer, I din't find it cool actually seeing a pattern somewhat like 3..7...5...117...8! But again, you people have sorted it alphabetically, which also makes sense. Makes me raise another question - If at all it matters, how would we come to know the "top contributors" if edit count is not the only metric? How will you be judging them?

--Pratik