I have already said myself that Vishnu misunderstood my words as a threat when it was not. Mistaking my words he had said, what he had to say. And later he had apologised in the same thread. That's why I said he has very poor understanding skills. And also i have said already 'there is no point accusing him, writing the email on the first place was a mistake by me'.

If that was not clear enough, let me say again. I'm dropping the allegation against Vishnu.

Thanks Ravi.

Ansuman

On 16 May 2014 18:52, Ravishankar <ravidreams@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I requested Ansuman to share his email conversation with Vishnu.

He gave only a very brief snippet.

From what was shared with me, it is impossible to form a clear opinion about the conversation. So the benefit of doubt should go to Vishnu.

The conversation goes like this:

Ansuman states that he will have to escalate some issue (which cannot be known unless the full conversation is shared) to the attention of WMF staff.

Vishnu views this as a potential threat, says this is against Wikipedia's Five pillars and says if such moves are made in future this can be held against Ansuman in a public platform (the nature of this platform is unclear. It could be even a open discussion in mailing list of META)

It is my personal judgment that neither of them have made any real threats of serious nature even though either party is bound to feel so in the heat of the conversation.

So, I request Ansuman to drop his allegation against Vishnu.

Doing so will only boost the integrity of the community and let us focus on real issues.

Ravi

_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l