Hi Shiju Alex,
*very* nice overview in numbers.
You’re calling it an ‘analysis’. Usually I expect some prose with an analysis – reasoning,
assumptions and conclusions.
Do you - or someone else - have any plans to add these at some point in time? Currently
each reader has to go through all the tables, make his own observations, mix in some
assumptions and distill conclusions from those. I truly understand that commenting on
numbers is probably even more work than gathering them in the current format in the first
place.
It could however be very valuable – and a great discussion starter – if someone would
comment on the numbers say every 6 months. It would also allow readers of the report to
just read the words, and have the tables as an annex.
Next steps could be to add goals, strategies to archieve them, and assess the goals and
strategies later on, based on this type of report.
Comments?
Siebrand
From: wikimediaindia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediaindia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Shiju Alex
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:29 PM
To: wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimediaindia-l] Indian language Wikipedias - Statistical report - 2010
January
Hello All
Please see the PDF file available at the location
http://shijualexonline.googlepages.com/2010_01_january_en.pdf for a detailed statistical
analysis of the Indian language wikipedias for the month of 2010 January.
<snip>