Vickram, what you said is an 'expanded' version of what I meant.
I see no point in wasting time and efforts on such sessions if the net result is zero.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan <parakara.ghoda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hisham, you say you're conducted 22+ sessions. How would you rate the
relative success of each of them? Four people editing on the day isn't
good enough. Long term editors should be used to measure success.I think what you mean to say is that the editors on the day need to be tracked (not them: their contributions) regularly. This might aid in directing them to whatever post-outreach assistance they need, and also might result in the outreach 'business' snowballing, once other editors see how effective this is. I see two kinds of success for an outreach program:1. Outreach multiplication, measured in outreach sessions per period (week/month/year)2. Successful outreach sessions, measured in number of editors contributing x periods (weeks/months/years) after they participated in an outreachThere is a third possible outcome, which is identifying (and perhaps rewarding) people who are good (ie conversion of newbies into editors) at outreach.I also see a different kind of outreach outcome, but which probably needs a different kind of outreach session, and that is through the addition of software contributors.--
Regards,
Srikanth Ramakrishnan.
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
--
Vickram
Fool On The Hill
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l