Yes, I choose many important factors that was available in wikimedia stats, The formula was derived by me but as a past student of economics i tried to do my best, basically i marked each factor on the scale of 100 so that no factor alone may affect the whole survey.<br>
<br>Thank you<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ravishankar <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:ravidreams@gmail.com">ravidreams@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Mayur, <div><br></div><div>Interesting analysis. Thanks for the hard work. </div><div><br></div><div>Is there any academic reference based on which the formula was arrived or is it empirical?</div><div><br></div><div>One possible indicator for a Wikipedia&#39;s quality may be offline activisim / organizing as it indicates the community&#39;s rapport which is very vital for overall quality control. Things like meetups, releasing CD etc.,</div>

<div><br></div><div>Ravi</div><div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>