Did any one check this scanner? 
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2070824/fujitsu-scansnap-sv600-review-touch-free-scanner-wont-damage-source-material.html

I'm finding it interesting, yet to see it in action. Any feedback would be much appreciated. 

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan <lshyamal@gmail.com> wrote:
Among the cons it says "The inability to digitize books larger than your typical paperback novel is a crippling factor."

best wishes
Shyamal


On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ravishankar Ayyakkannu <ravidreams@wikimedia.in> wrote:
Hi,

Will piQx Xcanex Portable Book and Document Scanner be a good machine for scanning old and brittle books?

Retaining as much color and quality for OCR needs is also essential.

I am aware of the suggestions in this mail thread about using a smart phone or regular pocket camera for scanning documents.

But, I am looking at large scale GLAM projects where a community owned scanning machine would be appropriate.

Ravi

_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l



_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l




--
Omshivaprakash H L | ಓಂಶಿವಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ಎಚ್.ಎಲ್ | ॐ शिवप्रकाश् एच्. एल्
Kannada SIG
Wikimedia India Chapter
File:Wikimedia India logo.svg