Did any one check this scanner?
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2070824/fujitsu-scansnap-sv600-review-touch-…
I'm finding it interesting, yet to see it in action. Any feedback would be
much appreciated.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Shyamal Lakshminarayanan <
lshyamal(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ravishankar, there is a review at
https://www.techinasia.com/piqxs-portable-scanner-change-books-digitized/
Among the cons it says "The inability to digitize books larger than your
typical paperback novel is a crippling factor."
best wishes
Shyamal
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ravishankar Ayyakkannu <
ravidreams(a)wikimedia.in> wrote:
Hi,
Will piQx Xcanex Portable Book and Document Scanner
<http://www.amazon.in/piQx-Xcanex-Portable-Document-Scanner/dp/B00DFWCCXS>
be a good machine for scanning old and brittle books?
Retaining as much color and quality for OCR needs is also essential.
<http://www.amazon.in/piQx-Xcanex-Portable-Document-Scanner/dp/B00DFWCCXS>
I am aware of the suggestions in this mail thread about using a smart
phone or regular pocket camera for scanning documents.
But, I am looking at large scale GLAM projects where a community owned
scanning machine would be appropriate.
Ravi
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list
Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
--
Omshivaprakash H L | ಓಂಶಿವಪ್ರಕಾಶ್ ಎಚ್.ಎಲ್ | ॐ शिवप्रकाश् एच्. एल्
Kannada SIG
Wikimedia India Chapter
[image: File:Wikimedia India logo.svg] <http://wiki.wikimedia.in/>