Hi Oliver<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 21:56, Oliver Keyes <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:okeyes@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">okeyes@wikimedia.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


The first is that the tool is directly saying &quot;what do you think about the content&quot; and not &quot;what do you think about the subject of the content&quot;, which might cut *some* junk. Second</blockquote></div>

<br>
This is partly true, also an option to &quot;move the feedback to talk page&quot; can help, so not just the feedback viewers get access to feedback (which would help improve the article), everyone else also has it.<div><br>

</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span>On the second front, there will be a full range of &quot;hide&quot; tools (and possibly the ability to block), and </span><span>the oversight</span><span> function is being included.</span><span>. It is still to be determined who will be able to use these &quot;hide&quot; tools.</span></blockquote>

<div> </div>
<div>I would also prefer to keep this barrier low. Am slightly concerned that one day the number of tools will grow more than the number of people there to monitor them (esp WikiProject India and other smaller projects) (exaggeration!) But growing editors is key and I hope this will directly / indirectly involve more people and make people to start editing (along with visual editor etc). <br clear="all">


<div><br></div><div>Hi Erik,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for pointers.</div><div><br></div>-- <br>Regards<br>Srikanth.L<br>
</div>