Ni!
Hi Tomasz, everyone,
I stand by what Rodrigo stated based on the links he provides us, to
which I add this message:
wherein on October 25 I explicitly called out to you and Maria that all
questions had been replied.
So please stand with less prejudice towards us and weight your words.
Regarding the guide, we find it useful, and yet it is what it is, a guide.
The purpose of a persistent committee is to accumulate wisdom and deal
with situations that should not be completely standardized, as the
Wikimedia Movement has understood is the case with chapter formation.
Because of that, we thank you very much for your time, and so let us go
ahead to make the best use of yours and ours. There are answers to your
latest questions on the wiki, plase check the page and fill it in should
there be other ones.
Your question (9 October 2012)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Brasil%2FAffCom&…
Our answer (25 October 2012)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Brasil%2FAffCom&…
And:
/"Just so we don't go off-label, can we agree that will be covered in
*wmbrorganization* ? ^=^ --Solstag
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Solstag> (talk
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Solstag>) 10:27, 9 October
2012 (UTC)
Sure, feel free to answer this wherever you want. odder
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Odder> (talk
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Odder>) 10:57, 9 October 2012
(UTC)" /
And if the answer was not clear, we have not received any feedback
saying it was not yet clear.
On 27 February 2013 06:39, Tomasz W. Kozłowski <odder.wiki(a)gmail.com
<mailto:odder.wiki@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 27 February 2013 <tel:2013> 04:41, Alexandre wrote:
There has not been a single edit to that page or
public reply since.
Exactly; there have not been any edits even from your side--and just
as I pointed out in my previous message, there is at least one
question that still awaits an answer; I asked it on October 9, and
have never heard back since.
As soon as you provide questions on that page we
can provide an
answer,
if there are any real issues to be clarified that
have not already
been.
For now, let us wait until the questions I asked in my e-mail are
answered; these /are/ real issues, and they haven't been clarified
yet.
The questions you seem to bring in your email, as
I understand, are
trivial and have been made and answered informally, but if you really
feel you need a group stateent, I again point you to the link above.
From my point of view, these are hardly trivial matters; quite the
opposite, I would consider a group getting approved without following
the usual process--described at
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_chapter_creation_guide>--quite
important.
As far as I know, this Committee has never been informed about your
plans to hold a founding meeting for the Association during that
conference; neither was it told about the actions to register the
Association that (apparently) followed that meeting. All this came to
us as a surprise when we learned about it on the day of the
conference.
Just tells us exactly what it is you need to
know, and we will provide
clear and thorough answers just as we have always done.
I was under the impression that my questions were clear enough; if
they are not, please let me know and I will try to rephrase them for
your convenience.
--
Tomasz W. Kozłowski
a.k.a. [[user:odder]]
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
--
Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
rodrigo.argenton(a)gmail.com <mailto:rodrigo.argenton@gmail.com>
+55 11 979 718 884
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l