2008/11/19 Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Brianna Laugher
Of course it will be under a free
license, probably CC-BY-SA.
Dual CC-BY-SA / GFDL would be nice, that would make it compatible with
the Wikimedia projects (and our own wiki!).
[I'm trying not to think about the licensing mess of transferring meta
content to officialwiki, and then meta content (probably) goes to
CC-BY-SA, but officialwiki doesn't because of the date cutoffs and
blah blah... you see? Gawd...]
Anyway dual licensing is of course a possibility, but I'm pretty sure
as long as CC-BY-SA is in there it doesn't much matter what else is.
They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: